CreditCards.com editorial, corrections policies

CreditCards.com’s editorial department has been covering the fast-changing payments industry since it started in 2007. They publish breaking news and useful information for consumers every weekday. CreditCards.com editorial

CreditCards.com is the only site that is responsible for the news and blog posts on its websites (except for user-generated content, which is defined on our Terms of Use page). We have received no payment or other consideration from any company, product, or person mentioned for placement on our editorial pages, unless otherwise stated. The company makes most of its money by showing customers side-by-side lists of cards and their features. When customers use the site to get a card, the company charges card issuers a fee. The journalists who work in the editorial department are not involved in the company’s day-to-day operations. The editors and writers at CreditCards.com have an average of more than 10 years of experience in journalism, and the company’s employees have won many awards for their work. CreditCards.com editorial

CreditCards.com’s editorial team works hard to write news articles and blogs that are fair, thorough, and correct. If you think we made a mistake in an article or want to say something about it, please get in touch with us by e-mail at [email protected], by fax at (512) 249-5209, or in writing to: CreditCards.com editorial

CreditCards.com is located at 9600 N. Mopac, Stonebridge Plaza II, Suite 500, Austin, TX 78759.
Editors, please pay attention

Call 512-996-8663, ext. 131.

We will fix small mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar on the website without telling you.

This page and a note in the corrected article will show the corrections we make when we find big mistakes in facts or substance. CreditCards.com editorial

We want to hear from people with many different points of view. Because of this, we won’t change the opinions of people we quote in news articles or those of people we ask to write op-ed pieces for us. We do welcome different points of view CreditCards.com editorial

If you wish to correct an article, please send the following information to [email protected]:
1. The URL (Web address) of the article which you wish to have us correct.
2. Your name and e-mail address. This information will never be shared with any third party or used in any way except to verify your information and to contact you for further details.
3. The error. If appropriate, let us know how we can verify that we erred. CreditCards.com editorial,

This corrections policy applies to articles written or commissioned by CreditCards.com’s editorial department. For questions about information presented by the company’s other departments, see the “Contact us” section. CreditCards.com editorial,

CORRECTIONS:

February 14, 2020
The article “Is credit card interest tax deductible?” incorrectly identified Greenpath credit counselor Jeff Arevalo.

July 29, 2019
The article “How to manage credit card debt ahead of the next recession” quoted a certified financial planner by the name of Patricia Russell, who was later found to have fabricated her identity and credentials. CreditCards.com editorial

April 25, 2019
The article, “Experian Boost: How to Sign Up, How Soon It Boosts Your Score,” incorrectly stated that Experian Boost data affects FICO score versions released prior to FICO 8.

February 8, 2018
The article “How to use a cash back card as a savings tool” incorrectly reported that SallieMae bank’s student loan services are sponsored by the government. CreditCards.com editorial

January 4, 2018
We incorrectly reported that, before 2011, Social Security numbers were assigned based on where and when people were born in the 2015 blog post, “Guard the last four digits of your Social Security number— they may be all ID thieves need.”

September 19, 2017
The article incorrectly explained how Plastiq makes payments to merchants using their service in “Plastiq, Tio: Pros, cons of charging your bills through an online service.”

June 15, 2017
We incorrectly stated the number of eligible investment accounts linked to a Fidelity Rewards Visa Signature card that can’t be directly withdrawn without high penalty fees in the story “Cash back cards survey: Complex is out, simple is in.” CreditCards.com editorial

March 16, 2017
The article incorrectly stated that only the primary account holder was eligible for the reward in “Who qualifies for the Costco 2% Executive reward?”

March 15, 2017
In the story “Cashback cards become more generous with rewards,” USAA Bank was described incorrectly.

Jan. 19, 2017
In the story “Are rewards points taxable or not?”, we mangled the name of the company Armstrong Financial Strategies. “Yes.” CreditCards.com editorial

Nov. 7, 2016
An incorrect Capital One credit card was mentioned in the story “7 ways rewards cards can trim holiday costs.”

Sept. 14, 2016
The name of readability expert Audrey Riffenburgh was misspelt in the story “Study: Credit card agreements unreadable to most Americans.”

June 30, 2016
The title of David Carlson’s book is “Hustle Away Debt”. As originally published, the title was incorrect in the story “Q&A with David Carlson: How side hustles can pare debt.”

Oct. 26, 2015
VantageScore, not FICO, is the source of free credit scores for USAA customers. It was misstated in the chart accompanying the article “Cards with free credit scores”. CreditCards.com editorial

July 2, 2015
The fees for Zipmark echeck processing services were misstated in the story, “Lowering merchant fees on large sales.” Fees for the company’s services start at 50 cents per transaction. The story has been corrected to reflect that.

Jan. 29, 2015
In the story headlined What merchant information is required on receipts?, small-business attorney Jason M. Gordon said he was not aware of any consumer protection law that requires a retailer to print the store’s name, address and telephone number on customer receipts. Further research by CreditCards.com and Gordon revealed that the Electronic Fund Transfer Act does require some identifying information on customer receipts, and the story has been changed to reflect that. CreditCards.com editorial

Nov. 12, 2014
The review period for a proposed rule affecting prepaid cards was misstated in the story, “New rules aim to tame prepaid cards.” The correct period is 90 days from the date of the proposed rule’s publication in the Federal Register, which occurred Dec. 23.

Oct. 7, 2014
The number of people employed part-time in September 2014 in the story, “Fed: Card balances fall for the first time in months,” was incorrectly stated. It has been corrected to be 7.1 million. CreditCards.com editorial

Sept. 30., 2014
A chart within the story headlined “Retailers roll out layaway plans early for 2014 holidays” had data switched: Information regarding Wal-Mart’s layaway program appeared in the column labelled Sears, and vice versa.

Feb. 13, 2014
The story, “Rewards programs move toward flexible, immediate spending,” misspells the name Melanie Backs.

Jan. 29, 2014
The reader Q&A headlined “Can you build business credit without a Social Security number?” reported that the application for Chase’s Ink Plus card asks for a Taxpayer Identification Number but says that if you don’t have one you can supply a Social Security number. It omitted the fact that Chase requires a Social Security number to complete the application, even if you have a TIN. CreditCards.com editorial

July 1, 2013, CreditCards.com editorial
The story headlined “Bill to curb employer credit check passes N.Y. Assembly” reported nine states had laws limiting pre-employment credit checks. It omitted a 10th state, Nevada, which passed such a law in May.

April 29, 2013
The story “Card add-on products stage a comeback” mischaracterised Capital One’s free credit monitoring services as applying to a secured card for students. The credit monitoring comes with the company’s secured card and its Journey credit card for students. CreditCards.com editorial

Jan. 25, 2013
The story “Credit card surcharges now allowed” misspelt the name of Mitch Goldstone’s company, ScanMyPhotos.com.

Oct. 27, 2011
The story “Gift card scams: How to spot them, how to avoid being a victim” misspelt the name of Peter Camenzind.

Oct. 25, 2011
A story headlined “7 ways to protect your credit rating during unemployment” incorrectly referred to employers checking prospective employees’ credit scores. While employers may and do check job applicants’ credit reports, the credit bureaus do not provide them with the credit scores derived from the reports. CreditCards.com editorial

June 8, 2011
As originally published, a pair of stories titled “Cure your defaulted student loan in six steps” and “Debunking a myth about wage garnishment and student loans” asserted that under the federal program for rehabilitating defaulted student loans, it is solely at the debtor’s discretion to decide what a “reasonable and affordable” repayment amount would be. While the debtor has considerable input in setting the amount, the decision on the repayment amount is not solely up to the debtor. It is a sum negotiated between the debtor and creditor that requires the debtor to document income and ability to pay. CreditCards.com editorial

April 25, 2011
A story published on April 20, 2011, now carries the headline “Shift in student credit cards sends interest rates higher,” but it originally had a misleading headline that could be interpreted as saying a Chase move directly impacted the national average credit card APR. Chase’s decision to no longer market a card triggered a change in the CreditCards.com database of cards, which indirectly caused a change in the national average. CreditCards.com editorial

April 21, 2011
As originally published, a story headlined “Study: Prepaid card can be better deal than a checking account”, published March 31, 2011, indicated that funds held on individuals’ reloadable debit cards were not FDIC insured. They are. A 2008 FDIC ruling made clear that even if a debit card issuer is not a bank, and it pools the funds of the debit card holders into a single account, FDIC insurance “passes through” to individual account holders.

Oct. 6, 2010
A reader Q&A titled “Act fast when hit by credit card fraud, even if mom and dad were to blame,” published on October 6, 2010, got the name of the Identity Theft Resource Center wrong. CreditCards.com editorial

June 26, 2010
The article “4 keys to credit, debit card zero-liability policies”, published June 10, 2010, incorrectly characterized the way PIN-based debit card transactions are processed.

May 20, 2010
A reader Q&A titled “Comparing desperate options: bankruptcy vs. debt negotiation”, published May 3, 2010, incorrectly said credit scores are used by employers in hiring decisions. They are not; credit reports are. CreditCards.com editorial

Feb. 13, 2010
An article about the FTC considering new regulations on ‘negative options’ misstated the nature of the product that triggered one consumer’s complaint.

Feb. 2, 2010
Two articles — “A guide to the Credit CARD Act of 2009” and “New Fed rules don’t cover business, corporate cards” — incorrectly described which service members are entitled to interest rate protection under the Service Members’ Civil Relief Act. The act’s benefits apply to active duty military personnel. CreditCards.com editorial

Nov. 9, 2009
A pair of stories published Nov. 5, 2009, erroneously said Discover cards would boost penalty rates following the passage of a credit card reform. The mistake was in the stories headlined “Discover debuts reform-law compliant credit card terms” and “Rates steady this week, but banks keep tweaking other terms.” The first story also stated that Capital One had pledged to forgo rate increases immediately due to the upcoming reform law; Capital One says it will comply with the law’s restrictions, which will take effect in 2010. CreditCards.com editorial

Sept. 9, 2009
An article titled Personal finance boot camps fight debt with hard-nosed approach, incorrectly stated the location of a financial boot camp run by Travis. It is in St. Louis.

June 17, 2009
An article titled 10 things you should know about identity theft, stated that your hotel room keys contain your personal information. This is an urban legend and is not true. CreditCards.com editorial

March 2, 2009
The article titled 7 credit card myths debunked, stated stated that Sam’s Club only accepted Discover and its own branded credit card. The chain also accepts MasterCard for in-store purchases, though they do not take American Express or Visa.

Feb. 25, 2009
In an article titled How different are Visa, AmEx, MasterCard and Discover?, it was incorrectly stated that Discover exclusively issues its own cards. The firm partners with several other card-issuing banks.

Feb. 18, 2009

In an article headlined 4 reasons you should get a department store credit card, the company name DebtGoal.com was misspelled.

Feb. 12, 2009
In a pair of Q&A columns titled ‘Take these steps to opt out of a rate increase and How to opt out of credit card rate increases, the ability of consumers to opt out of interest rate increases was overstated. At the time of publication, opting out was a privilege, not a right, granted by most card issuers. Since publication, opting out has become a right mandated by federal law. CreditCards.com editorial

Feb. 9, 2009
In a story headlined Wipe the slate clean by settling old debts, it was incorrectly stated that by paying off delinquent debt that went into collection, your credit score will improve. In fact, it is the original delinquency that is factored into your credit score, and paying that account will not improve your score. CreditCards.com editorial

Feb. 5, 2009
A story headline, ‘Experian FICO score may soon be off-limits to consumers,’ included a miscount of the number of credit score-related products that would be impacted by the end of a deal between Fair Isaac and Experian. CreditCards.com editorial

Jan. 19, 2009
A storheadlined ‘7 7 things not to do when you’ve maxed out your credit cards incorrectly characterised Thrive. It is an online personal financial advisory service. CreditCards.com editorial

July 2, 2008
A story headlined ‘ Credit checks for job applicants became more common, originally published July 1, 2008, misspelt the name of Todd L. Moss, president of Crimcheck.com. CreditCards.com editorial

July 1, 2008
The Credit Guy column, ‘What VantageScores are and how they work’, originally published June 30, 2008, mischaracterised how consumers may obtain their VantageScore credit reports. CreditCards.com editorial